This Week: Films
THE
GOOD: "The Life and Times of Hank Greenberg"
"As Hitler invaded Europe, a young Jewish baseball player challenged Babe
Ruth's home run record." So begins Aviva Kempner's fascinating 1999 documentary
of the legendary Detroit Tiger. "Life and Times" is so full of charm
and chutzpah that even my baseball-hating wife even enjoyed it. Not content to
focus simply on baseball, Kempner examines Greenberg's effect on Jews throughout
the United States, at a time when both the U.S. and Europe were full of anti-Semitic
fervor (Detroit's Father Coughlin and Henry Ford were our own standard bearers).
Hammerin' Hank is one of my personal heroes, and he emerges not only a great baseball
player, but a kind and thoughtful man, whose experience in World War II left him
somewhat distant from his religion. Fast-paced and hugely entertaining, it includes
interviews with such baseball luminaries as Ernie Harwell, Bob Feller and Charlie
Gehringer, as well as Walter Matthau, who joined a tennis club just to meet the
man.
THE
BAD: Ken Burns' "Baseball"
The book is better, but not by much. "Baseball" reminds us of the
American History we're taught in Midwestern grade schools: everything in bright
colors, full of confidence and wholesomeness, acknowledging the mistakes the sport
has madesuch as the disgusting segregation that haunts it to this daythen
discarded as if they were mere abstractions whose lessons were learned and rectified.
Everything presented in sepia tones and a warm nostalgia that makes a fan feel
good all over. This flick is a marbleized statue from Dullsville, with horrid
commentary by the sleepyvoiced Garrison Keillor, bland George Will and perhaps
the only African-American ballplayer without a hint of anger (where's Bob Gibson?).
With its tintype nostalgia for the glorious baseball past that never existed,
it leaves a sticky residue over the mind of the honest fan. Filled with more gooey
references to "The Church of Baseball", and baseball as religion, "Baseball"
is more torture than fun.
THE
UGLY: the Kevin Costner baseball trilogy
Here's something to consider: if "Bull Durham" weren't about baseball,
no one would be watching it today. And the speechifying betwixt Susan Sarandon
and Costner? If we hear it one more time, we'll puke. This doesn't take away from
the fact that, as a whole, the director, Ron Shelton, did get the baseball side
of it right, and elicited performances from all his playersespecially the
sorely missed Trey Wilson as the coachmakes it the best of the three. As
for "Field of Dreams"you can file that crap in the wastebasket
with most baseball filmsCostner and Co. prancing around the cornfields is
the epitome of what is wrong with most baseball films: all nostalgia and no meat.
"Field" says nothing about the real game of baseball, and everything
about the New Age tripe that muddles the sport today. And as for "For Love
of the Game", well, that one skirts the middle. If only it stayed closer
to the ballgame, and left old Kevin alone and crying in his hotel roomas
opposed to the happy, sappy endingthis would rank up there with "Bull
Durham". Hard to believe its from the man who brought us "The Evil Dead"
|